Ssempebwa, JudeNdagire, Abisagi KasomaKule, AbrahamSsekyewa, CharlesNnyanzi, DavidKisolo, GelvanNyende, JeremiahMasereka, JosephNambuubi, JulietOtaala, LauraAkello, Lucy DoraOdong, MosesOkullo, Nellie FlorenceKanyandago, PeterLugemwa, PeterOuma, RichardAkabwai, Steven2018-12-172018-12-1720122225-5656http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12280/1232Poverty in Uganda has been the subject of extensive scholarship and policy attention. Subsequently, several poverty alleviation programmes/ projects have been implemented in the country over the last five decades. Although successive surveys have reported notable improvements in the quality of life, there is evidence that many households are still stagnating in poverty. Why? How come the poverty alleviation programmes/ projects that are enabling some households to transit poverty are not working for the households stagnating in poverty? This study delved into these questions, taking the case of Central Uganda. The findings were that the households that are stagnating in poverty suffer from a broad syndrome of disadvantage, which affects their capacity to transit from poverty. However, it was also found that, despite their indisputable challenges, many of them are stagnating in poverty because they don’t feel that they are poor. Differences were noted between their view of poverty and the traditional view of poverty (by which they are characterized as poor). It was concluded that poverty alleviation programs/ projects have not transformed them because the interventions delivered under the programmes/ projects are based on the traditional view of poverty. Thus, it is recommended that those designing/ implementing these programs/ projects synchronize their view of poverty with the views of the poor whose poverty they are working to alleviate.enAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Stateshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/Poverty alleviationParticipatory appraisalSustainable developmentArticle