Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrownbridge, Martin
dc.description.abstractThe strategy for expanding public services through donor funding is flawed and is doomed to fail. Donor funding necessitates increased internal public expenditure. This shifts resources away from the export-oriented private sector, which would bring about economic growth and provide a basis for a more comprehensive poverty reduction. There are also absorptive limitations in the use of large donor aid. Donor funds distort Government’s budget allocation pattern, cohesion and stability. The funding gap envisaged under MDGs by donor aid advocates ranges between 6.4% to13.6% of Uganda’s GDP, which are enormous. Large donor aid will lead to contraction of the private sector, appreciation of the shilling and falling prices of agricultural produce. It would mean that the Government would have to depend on donors for over 60% of its budget. And yet donor funding is volatile and unpredictable. The strategy of achieving MDGs through large donor aid should be abandoned. Instead, as projected in the long-term expenditure framework, Uganda should concentrate on the current budget policy to increase economic growth. In 10 years, revenue will have increased by 150% and health expenditure will be about 15% of the Government expenditure.en_US
dc.publisherUganda Martyrs University, Department of Health Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.subjectFinancing the MDGsen_US
dc.subjectMillenium Developement Goals (MDGs)en_US
dc.subjectPublic Spendingen_US
dc.subjectDononr Fundingen_US
dc.titleFinancing the Millennium Development Goals: Is More Public Spending the Best Way to Meet Poverty Reduction Targets?en_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States