Uganda Martyrs University Institutional Repository (UMU-IR)
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   UMU-IR Home
    • Research Articles
    • Faculty of Health Science
    • Journal Articles (Health)
    • View Item
    •   UMU-IR Home
    • Research Articles
    • Faculty of Health Science
    • Journal Articles (Health)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Making the transition to workload-based staffing:

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Making_the_transition_to_workload-based.pdf (790.8Kb)
    Date
    2015
    Author
    Namaganda, Grace
    Oketcho, Vincent
    Bakaitwoha, Everd Maniple
    Viadro, Claire
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: Uganda’s health workforce is characterized by shortages and inequitable distribution of qualified health workers. To ascertain staffing levels, Uganda uses fixed government-approved norms determined by facility type. This approach cannot distinguish between facilities of the same type that have different staffing needs. The Workload Indicators of Staffing Need (WISN) method uses workload to determine number and type of staff required in a given facility. The national WISN assessment sought to demonstrate the limitations of the existing norms and generate evidence to influence health unit staffing and staff deployment for efficient utilization of available scarce human resources. Methods: A national WISN assessment (September 2012) used purposive sampling to select 136 public health facilities in 33/112 districts. The study examined staffing requirements for five cadres (nursing assistants, nurses, midwives, clinical officers, doctors) at health centres II (n= 59), III (n= 53) and IV (n= 13) and hospitals (n= 11). Using health management information system workload data (1 July 2010 – 30 June 2011), the study compared current and required staff, assessed workload pressure and evaluated the adequacy of the existing staffing norms. Results: By the WISN method, all three types of health centres had fewer nurses (42 – 70%) and midwives (53 – 67%) than required and consequently exhibited high workload pressure (30 –58%) for those cadres. Health centres IV and hospitals lacked doctors (39 – 42%) but were adequately staffed with clinical officers. All facilities displayed overstaffing of nursing assistants. For all cadres at health centres III and IV other than nursing assistants, the fixed norms or existing staffing or both fell short of the WISN staffing requirements, with, for example, only half as many nurses and midwives as required. Conclusions: The WISN results demonstrate the inadequacies of existing staffing norms, particularly for health centres III and IV. The results provide an evidence base to reshape policy, adopt workload-based norms, review scopes of practice and target human resource investments. In the near term, the government could redistribute existing health workers to improve staffing equity in line with the WISN results. Longer term revision of staffing norms and investments to effectively reflect actual workloads and ensure provision of quality services at all levels is needed.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12280/410
    Collections
    • Journal Articles (Health) [173]

    UMU-IR
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Library | Library Catalogue
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    UMU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    UMU-IR
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Library | Library Catalogue
    Atmire NV