Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKasozi, Keneth Iceland
dc.contributor.authorWelburn, Susan Christina
dc.contributor.authorEl-Saber Batiha, Gaber
dc.contributor.authorMarraiki, Najat
dc.contributor.authorNalumenya, David Paul
dc.contributor.authorNamayanja, Monica
dc.contributor.authorMatama, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorZalwango, Kelly Katenta
dc.contributor.authorMatovu, Wycliff
dc.contributor.authorZirintunda, Gerald
dc.contributor.authorEkou, Justine
dc.contributor.authorKembabazi, Stellamaris
dc.contributor.authorMugasa, Claire Mack
dc.contributor.authorKitibwa, Annah
dc.contributor.authorTayebwa, Dickson Stuart
dc.contributor.authorMusinguzi, Simon Peter
dc.contributor.authorMahero, Michael
dc.contributor.authorSsengendo, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorNanteza, Anne
dc.contributor.authorMatovu, Enock
dc.contributor.authorMacLeod, Ewan Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-20T13:08:34Z
dc.date.available2024-03-20T13:08:34Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-04
dc.identifier.issn2405-8440
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12280/3073
dc.description.abstractInformation as regards the epidemiology of the Anaplasmataceae in small ruminants in several lowand middle-income countries is scarce. In this study a total of 712 DNA samples collected from small ruminants were analyzed for Anaplasmataceae and Anaplasma ovis using the 16S rRNA and MSP4 genes respectively. Infection risk was assessed by location, sex and age of the animals and qGIS® was used to construct spatial maps. The prevalence of Anaplasmataceae spp was 89.1% (95% CI: 77.5–95.9) and 79.1% (95% CI: 75.9–82.1) in ovines and caprines respectively (RR ¼ 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0–1.3); higher than those previously reported in other eastern African countries. The prevalence of A. ovis was 26.1% and 25.4% for both ovines and caprines respectively with ovines showing significantly higher levels of infection than caprines (P < 0.05). The risk of Anaplasma ovis infections was not affected by age (OR ¼ 1.2, 95% CI: 0.9–1.7) or sex (OR ¼ 1.1, 95% CI: 0.6–2.0). Small ruminants located at the forest edge (<0.3 km) showed higher A. ovis prevalence than those found inland with infections present in the midland regions associated with increased agricultural activity. Anaplasma ovis remains a major challenge for small ruminant husbandry in Uganda and infections are under-reported. Policy efforts to prioritize management of Anaplasmataceae for small ruminant health would promote livestock productivity in vulnerable communities, improving livelihoods and ecosystem health.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHeliyon;7 (2021) e05688
dc.subjectTick-borne diseasesen_US
dc.subjectAnaplasma ovisen_US
dc.subjectParasitesen_US
dc.subjectSmall ruminantsen_US
dc.subjectGoatsen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.subjectAfricaen_US
dc.subjectTicksen_US
dc.subjectTick resistanceen_US
dc.subjectTick vaccinesen_US
dc.subjectEntomologyen_US
dc.subjectEcosystem servicesen_US
dc.subjectProtozoaen_US
dc.subjectPolymerase chain reactionen_US
dc.subjectEpidemiologyen_US
dc.subjectVeterinary medicineen_US
dc.subjectAnimal behavioren_US
dc.subjectAnimal breedingen_US
dc.subjectRuminanten_US
dc.subjectAgricultureen_US
dc.titleMolecular epidemiology of anaplasmosis in small ruminants along a human-livestock-wildlife interface in Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record