Local anesthesia versus saddle block for open hemorrhoidectomy: cost-analysis from a randomized, double blind controlled trial
Date
2023-11-22Author
Sikakulya, Franck Katembo
Ssebuufu, Robinson
Okedi, Francis Xaviour
Baluku, Moris
Lule, Herman
Kiyaka, Sonye Magugu
Muhumuza, Joshua
Molen, Selamo Fabrice
Bassara, Godefroy Nyenke
Waziri, Musa Abbas
Kithinji, Stephen Mbae
Mugisho Munyerenkana, Leocadie
Kagenderezo, Byamungu Pahari
Munihire, Jeannot Baanitse
Vahwere, Bienfait Mumbere
Kiswezi, Ahmed
Kyamanywa, Patrick
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Despite the benefits attributed to the use of local anesthesia (LA) for open hemorrhoidectomy (OH) in
developed countries, this technique is still not considered as the first line technique in low-income countries such as
Uganda; therefore, we aimed at comparing the cost of OH under LA versus Saddle block among patients with 3rd or
4th degree hemorrhoids.
This trial was conducted from December 2021 to May 2022 among patients with primary uncomplicated
3rd or 4th degree hemorrhoids. The operating time, and direct costs in (US$) including medical and non-medical were
recorded. We analysed the cost in the two groups (local anesthesia versus saddle block) using SPSS version 23.0.
Findings of fifty-eight patients were analysed including 29 participants per group. There was a significant
difference in operating time and cost among the two groups (p<0.05). The mean operating time was 15.52±5.34(SD)
minutes versus 33.72±11.54 min for OH under LA and SB respectively. The mean cost of OH under LA was 57.42±8.90
US$ compared to 63.38±12.77US$ in SB group.
The use of local anesthesia for OH was found to have less operating time with high-cost effectiveness.
Being affordable, local anesthesia can help to increase the turnover of patients who would otherwise wait for the
availability of anesthesia provider. Policy makers should emphasize its applicability in low-income settings to help in
the achievement of 2030 global surgery goals.
Collections
- Journal Article [92]