Browsing by Author "Maniple, Everd"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Economic Impact of Lacor Hospital on the Surrounding Area(Uganda Martyrs University, Department of Health Sciences, 2003-12) Maniple, Everd; Akello, Evelyn; Asio, Salome; Auma, Vento; Kazibwe, Francis; Lule, Haruna; Corrado, Bruno; Odaga, JohnThe health care industry is an important contributor to the economy, especially to that of the area surrounding health institutions. This effect is even more marked in the case of rural facilities. At national level, it comes in the form of ensuring a healthy productive population and saving costs that would have otherwise been spent on treatment, thus liberating them for use on other developmental purposes. However, being a labour-intensive industry, it also contributes by providing employment for a significant section of the working-age population. At local level, in addition to the general benefits mentioned above, it comes in the form of attracting significant government and external investment to the area, and providing a market for local goods and services. It also helps to ‘keep health dollars at home’by ensuring that locals are treated within their area and thus retaining their health expenditure within their own economy. Yet, the economic impact of the health care industry is still under-estimated the world over, Uganda inclusive. Until recently, most studies of economic impact concentrated on the contribution of activities other than health care (Scorsone 2001; Scorsone 2002) and as such, there are few articles available to be reviewed about healthcare. Although healthcare contributes to economic growth, some studies have not found it to be among the leading causes of rural economic growth. In a study of rural USA, presence of healthcare services was not perceived by the respondents to be even one of the top 25 causes of rural economic growth (Aldrich and Kusmin 1997). This study in Lacor was therefore done to try to identify and highlight the economic contribution of St. Mary’s Lacor Hospital to the war-torn Gulu region of northern Uganda, which contribution though quietly perceived, has never been quantified and, as such, appears to have been ignored. By the economic impact of an organisation on an area, we refer to the influence of that organization on the local economy in terms of the level of economic activity generated as a result of the presence of that organisation. This could be the amount of money it injects into the area from its budget, the employment it provides, the goods and services it consumes from the area thus providing a market for them, the money it attracts to the area from the government, donors and researchers, and its role in the attraction and retention of businesses and other gainful economic activity in that area. The net economic impact of such an organisation is, therefore, the expansion or contraction of an area’s economy. This should, however, be distinguished from the gross economic effects due to mere influence on the jobs, businesses or incomes (Weisbrod and Weisbrod 1997). The diagram below shows a model of the interaction between an industry like a healthcare institution producing health care and the community, containing other industries and households. The institution absorbs inputs from outside the local economy and uses some from the local economy to produce its products. Its products are consumed by the local community and beyond. The institution may also make expenditures and investments outside the local economy as shown in this second model. Economic impact studies try to measure the direct, indirect and induced effects of an institution on the economy. The institution’s direct expenditure, such as when a hospital pays its local staff, is a direct input into the local economy. Purchase of goods and contracted services from the local area such as office and medical supplies, kitchen, cleaning and laundry supplies, masonry etc. is an indirect input. When the employees of the health care institution and those of its suppliers of goods and services get and spend their money in the local economy, this is an induced impact on that economy due to the presence of that institution. Thus, initial expenditures in the health sector cause a ripple of expenditures in the economy, the so-called ‘ripple effect’. The health sector and hospitals in particular are regarded by many a policy maker as economic ‘black boxes’, merely absorbing resources with, in most cases, no light on how they spend them or as ‘bottomless black holes’ consuming resources on end. Rarely are they seen as “economic boosters” or ‘productive’ entities. In reality, however, the health sector leads to the creation and thriving of support business and payment of taxes around it (Philippakos et al. 2002). That is not to mention the economic impact that is gained by the local economy when the people are treated and gain energy to produce or the gains due to the cost of illness and death saved by receiving health education on health promotion and prevention of illness or actually being treated or rehabilitated in the hospital. Apart from health care provision at various levels, Lacor hospital makes similar economic contributions to the area of Gulu District.Item Export Health Workers? For Uganda, An Indecent Proposal Until…(Uganda Martyrs University, Department of Health Sciences, 2004-12) Maniple, EverdThis paper challenges the decision by the Government of Uganda to export health workers to developed countries. It argues that while the Ugandan National Health Policy emphasises strengthening the numbers of health personnel in order to be able to provide a minimum health care package and to redress the imbalances in distribution of skilled staff, it is totally contradictory to start exporting the few personnel available. The paper acknowledges that there are high rates of unemployment in the country and that there are well-recognised benefits of migration of skilled personnel. It also acknowledges that Ugandan health workers have always been on the exodus. However, it also asserts that given the inadequate human resource for health capacity of the country, the government has no justification facilitating the exodus by providing a platform for foreign headhunters of health workers. Finally, it points out some problems that are likely to arise from this untimely export of health workers as well as some measures that the country could adopt to maximize the benefit from Uganda's migrant workers.Item Missed Opportunity for Neonates to Live: A Cross-sectional study on Utilization of Peri-natal Death Audits to address the Causes of Peri-Natal Mortality in District Hospitals of East–Central Uganda.(Students journal of health research Africa, 2022-09-10) Waako, Christopher Knox; Nanyingi, Miisa; Katongole, Simon Peter; Atuhairwe, Christine; Konso, Jennipher Mariam; Maniple, EverdAim: To assess the utilization of PDAs in addressing the avoidable causes of perinatal mortality in the eastern region of Uganda. Methodology: A cross-section design using a mixed method was conducted between 2014-2015 at Iganga, Bugiri, and Kamuli general hospitals in the East-Central region of Uganda. The interviews involved 115 health workers who included Doctors, Nurses/Midwives, Clinical officers, and Laboratory and Theatre staff. These were drawn from four departments including the Maternity ward, Outpatient department, Theatre, and paediatric ward. Hospital top and departmental managers formed the key informants for this study. Annual reports for the period 2009/10-2012/13 were reviewed. In addition, monthly reports for the calendar year 2013 together with patients’ clinical case notes and patients’ registers were also reviewed to determine the magnitude and causes of perinatal mortality. Factors contributing to perinatal death were assessed and categorized into foetal, maternal, and health facility factors. Results: Results revealed a high and rising perinatal mortality rate of 70/1,000 live births and a decreasing maternal mortality ratio of 363/100,000 live births. Most perinatal deaths were fresh stillbirths 48/88 which occurred during the intrapartum period and the majority of early neonatal death was due to birth asphyxia. None of the health facilities was conducting perinatal death audits and the quality of data used for perinatal death audits was inadequate and was scored poorly. Challenges hindering utilization of perinatal death audits included: lack of staff sensitization and training, work overload, lack of motivation, fear of blame and litigation, political interference, and lack of support from the community. Conclusion: There was a high prevalence of perinatal deaths in east-central Uganda yet none of the hospitals was conducting perinatal death reviews. Recommendations: Health workers should be trained on perinatal death audit tools and guidelines and the records departments are revitalized with tools and personnel for effective data management.