Uganda Martyrs University Institutional Repository (UMU-IR)
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   UMU-IR Home
    • Research Articles
    • Faculty of Science
    • Journal Articles (Science)
    • View Item
    •   UMU-IR Home
    • Research Articles
    • Faculty of Science
    • Journal Articles (Science)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Who should diversify and move out of agriculture? Income portfolios and household welfare in rural Uganda

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Kakungulu_SCIE_ARTICLE_2018A.pdf (1.541Mb)
    Date
    2018
    Author
    Kakungulu, Moses
    Teopista, Kevin Akoyi
    Kaat, Van Hoyweghen
    Liesbet, Vranken
    Isabirye, Moses
    Miet, Maertens
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In this paper we present empirical evidence of the welfare effects of rural income diversification and off-farm income generation. We use household survey data from two panel rounds in rural Uganda, and fixed and random effects estimation and quantile regressions to estimate average and heterogeneous effects. While the literature mostly focuses on either income diversification or participation in off-farm activities, we specifically distinguish between income diversification, using the Simpson index of diversification, and off-farm income generation. We use ex post income and poverty measures as well as an ex ante vulnerability measure to analyze the welfare effects of income diversification out of agriculture. Our results lead to nuanced findings that complement existing insights. We find that income diversification and off-farm income generation improve household income, reduce their likelihood to be poor and reduce their vulnerability to poverty. We find quite strong average effects: a 10 percentage point increase in the Simpson index or in the share of off-farm income in the portfolio, increases per capita income with around 13 percent reduces the likelihood to be poor with around five percent. We find that it is most beneficial for poorer households with less land assets to diversify their income portfolio, while moving out of agriculture is equally beneficial at all income levels and most beneficial for households with more human capital. In addition, we find that income diversification reduces vulnerability at all income levels, but most strongly at high levels of diversification and low levels of income. Off-farm income generation reduces vulnerability at lower levels of off-farm income, while it increases vulnerability at higher levels of off-farm income generation. We conclude that income diversification serves both income growth and income smoothing while off-farm income generation mainly serves income growth. Key Words: income diversification; off-farm income; poverty; vulnerability; Sub-Saharan Africa; Uganda
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12280/1233
    Collections
    • Journal Articles (Science) [26]

    UMU-IR
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Library | Library Catalogue
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    UMU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    UMU-IR
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Library | Library Catalogue
    Atmire NV